A revised and updated version of
Abraham Kuyper: An Annotated Bibliography 1857-2010 by Tjitze Kuipers (2011)

You can buy a printed edition of this book on the site of the publisher.

1900

[Parliamentary speeches.]
In: Verslag van de handelingen der Staten-Generaal. Zitting van 19 September 1899–15 September 1900. Verslag der handelingen van de Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal gedurende het zittingjaar 1899–1900.
’s Gravenhage, Algemeene Landsdrukkerij 1900, pp. 1073–1080, 1115–1119, 1202–1204, 1264–1267, 1293–1295, 1316–1318, 1329, 1368–1369, 1483–1484, 1496–1497, 1546–1547, 1550, 1556–1558, 1559–1560, 1638, 1641, 1643–1644, 1650–1652, 1745, 1783–1784, 1817–1818, 1827–1828, 1831, 1843–1844, 1850.
Published in parts.
Not included in 1908.20: pp. 1202–1204, 1483–1484, 1638, 1641, 1643–1644, 1650–1652, 1745, 1817–1818, 1831, 1843–1844, 1850.

In the period March 2–23, 1900, Kuyper addressed the Second Chamber on the subject of statutory regulation of compulsory education (pp. 1073–1329) as well as about several amendments to proposed legislation (pp. 1202–1204). On April 3 Kuyper supported a motion to delay discussion of a treaty intended to settle international disagreements because belligerent England was among its signatories (pp. 1368–1369). Six sessions later he offered a few practical tips about how better to counteract deception in the butter trade (pp. 1483–1484). During the session from May 15 to May 18, Kuyper spoke several times about the draft legislation on paternal power (Kuyper preferred to speak about “paternal authority”) and custody (pp. 1496–1560). In the reports on pages 1638–1745, the topics have primarily to do with several educational matters. On June 21 Kuyper spoke about a motion arising from the rejected petition for pardon for P.J. Troelstra, a member of Parliament. Kuyper opposed the motion on formal grounds (pp. 1783–1784). The discussions on pages 1817–1818 and 1843–1850 have to do with amendments. On June 26 Kuyper spoke about the Second Chamber’s proposed inquiry into the newly drafted disability law (pp. 1843–1844), which was submitted after the previous draft bill was rejected by the First Chamber. Page 1831 conveys what Kuyper said on the next day about the proposed schedule for that inquiry.